Making the Future Female

Romney and Ryan – Best Advert for Abortion – Ever!


Romney and Ryan have both staked out staunchly conservative positions on abortion. Ryan, who is Catholic, opposes abortion except when the life of the mother is at risk. Romney believes in additional exceptions for rape and incest.

One of the bills Ryan cosponsored would define human life as beginning at the moment of fertilization — a far-reaching approach that could limit access to contraception and procedures like in vitro fertilization. It’s similar to the “personhood” approach, which voters in deeply conservative Mississippi rejected last November. The Hill

Advertisements

26 responses

  1. Nutters who promote anti-women laws, call a 1-second old foetus a person and try to stop poor folks receiving social security are always self-proclaimed Christians. And they always support wars that kill millions and leave terrible consequences for future generations. This is why we’re calling for the FEMINISATION of society. Monsters like Romney and Ryan shouldn’t ever be in power because they’re destroying the world for us and those yet to come. Nation states concentrate power in the hands of a few and have resulted in the present mess. Let’s make the Future Female!

    August 15, 2012 at 12:03 pm

  2. These guys aren’t Christains – they’re Devil Worshippers!

    August 15, 2012 at 12:05 pm

  3. Do you also believe that someone is “respecting” you if they decide to kill you in order to save you from future “problems?”

    August 15, 2012 at 3:08 pm

    • If it’s the lesser of two evils then it should be considered. Why?

      August 15, 2012 at 5:49 pm

      • Who judges which is the “lesser of two evils,” you or the one who wishes to kill you?

        August 15, 2012 at 7:55 pm

  4. Well, it is a medical and biological fact that at the moment of conception a new human life which is genetically unique and distinct from each of its parents begins.

    August 15, 2012 at 3:27 pm

    • So?

      August 15, 2012 at 5:55 pm

      • So then in your opinion it is morally acceptable to kill certain human beings simply because they are an inconvenience?

        August 15, 2012 at 5:57 pm

      • Inconvenience? Jumping about a bit aren’t we?

        August 15, 2012 at 6:00 pm

      • Not really, the guttmacher institute keeps stats on why women seek elective abortion. Virtually all are for matters of convenience.

        August 15, 2012 at 6:03 pm

      • And? Human overpopulation is a massive threat to the whole ecosystem – each abortion saves the planet.

        August 15, 2012 at 6:07 pm

      • Actually the earth is not overpopulated. People compared to the possible living space on land is huge, people could have acres to themselves of the spread out.

        Your view here by the way is abhorrent.

        August 15, 2012 at 6:54 pm

      • You’re talking rubbish mate.
        My blog, my viewpoint.
        Don’t read it if you can’t handle it x

        August 15, 2012 at 7:01 pm

      • “We’re not saying it’s the new religion. The time of leaders has passed, and the age of governments is ending. We’re not looking to the past but to the future. We don’t need gods and goddesses for we are women – we gave birth to humanity and we’ll solve our own problems.” Sharon Brough

        August 15, 2012 at 7:06 pm

      • John Barron is talking sense; you’re talking rubbish, lowerarchy.

        For someone as educated as you claim to be, you’re awfully stupid. The earth is not overpopulated in any way, shape, or form. Food shortages are almost solely confined to third-world countries that lack infrastructure and technological advancement.

        Furthermore, it’s ironic that someone so obsessed with femininity would wish a future bereft of males. Without us, the to-be-hailed woman would eventually become extinct. Perhaps you haven’t thought it out clearly. (Ugh. Liberals).

        By the way: you represent everything that is wrong with society. You are the worst of the worst.

        August 16, 2012 at 6:51 am

      • I’ve noticed that those who accuse others of being “stupid” tend to be the most intellectually challenged but don’t worry, it’s not the end of the world. Education can help if you promise to leave your stone age ideas at the door when you enrol.
        If you think my posts are bad so far, then hide your innocent eyes boy because it’s going to get much more challenging for you atavistic types.
        I just looked at your profile and doubt whether you understand the word “ironic” – but again, ignorance can be alleviated by learning.
        Finally, I thought you conservatives didn’t believe in society.

        August 16, 2012 at 9:03 pm

  5. of course it’s your blog. I’m just offering my opinion of your view. But as to my claim, only 5% of the United States is actually developed. And as far as overpopulation, each person in the world could have their own space equal to Red Square in Russia. http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/10/world-population-1

    The world is not overpopulated. It only seems so because we all cram into cities, and live on top of eachother. The vast majority of land in the world is raw land, undeveloped. That’s just a fact. You may believe we should have more, but that’s a different argument.

    August 15, 2012 at 7:48 pm

    • Exactamundo! Preach!

      August 15, 2012 at 8:02 pm

      • Learn to draw.

        August 16, 2012 at 8:48 pm

      • …or you’ll abort me? 😦

        August 17, 2012 at 1:40 am

      • Only if you’re at least 24 weeks old – I can’t tell from your posts…

        August 17, 2012 at 6:52 am

      • At “least” 24 weeks old? At least??! Wha…what kind of MONSTER are you? 😮

        August 17, 2012 at 2:22 pm

      • Gotcha!

        August 17, 2012 at 3:32 pm

    • Abhorrent? You offend easily for someone with such strident views. Nobody’s bothered if you are offended or not. Of course most of the planet is uninhabited – mountains, deserts, salt flats, arable land, forests and tundra are all unsuitable for habitation.

      August 16, 2012 at 8:47 pm

      • FYI, I’m living in one of the aforementioned areas that you deem “unsuitable for habitation.”

        August 17, 2012 at 1:59 am

      • Oh sorry to hear that – we’ve got a spare room if you’re in need x

        August 17, 2012 at 6:53 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s