We’ve just watched a really mind-blowing documentary film about 9/11 – in particular the supposed attack on the Pentagon.
BTW Does anybody know why this building has five sides?
The movie is entitled
If you only watch one 9/11 film in your life, then I suggest you spend one hour twenty minutes on this movie.
This is what the makers say about the documentary:
In 2006 Citizen Investigation Team launched an independent investigation into the act of terrorism which took place at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.
This exhaustive three-year inquest involved multiple trips to the scene of the crime in Arlington, Virginia, close scrutiny of all official and unofficial data related to the event, and, most importantly, first-person interviews with dozens of eyewitnesses, many of which were conducted and filmed in the exact locations from which they witnessed the plane that allegedly struck the building that day.
Be forewarned: Our findings are extraordinarily shocking and frightening. They are also deadly serious, and deserving of your immediate attention. This is not about a conspiracy theory or any theory at all.
This is about independent, verifiable evidence which unfortunately happens to conclusively establish as a historical fact that the violence which took place in Arlington that day was not the result of a surprise attack by suicide hijackers, but rather a false flag “black operation” involving a carefully planned and skillfully executed deception.
(More at citizeninvestigationteam.com)
If you’re prone to worrying about leaving your emails to pile up rather than deal with them promptly, then hold on, you’re in good company.
The Pakistani secret service, the ISI, hasn’t answered theirs for over a year.
But wait you say, that’s no big deal, most emails are junk anyway. They’re probably only spam and letters from relatives raving about the holidays you weren’t invited to go on with thousands of pictures of people you never want to see again.
And the ISI won’t reply so they can claim it is nothing to do with them…
And in the crazy world of counter-terrorism and international law, the US government lawyers regard this as tacit approval, because Pakistan does respond in kind. It does this by “de-conflicting” its airspace – in normal speech – Pakistan prevents its aircraft from flying in the areas concerned.
In an April speech, White House counterterrorism adviser John Brennan said the administration has concluded there is nothing in international law barring the U.S. from using lethal force against a threat to the U.S., despite the absence of a declared war, provided the country involved consents or is unable or unwilling to take action against the threat.
So that’s okay then.
LAUNCH THEM DRONES…
Britain has colluded with the Pakistani leadership for decades as a way of stopping democratic change which would weaken the UK’s power in the region. It is the same in Egypt where successive UK governments have worked behind the scenes with the Muslim Brotherhood to prevent nationalist and liberal forces gaining power. See also the coup against a democratically elected government in Iraq orchestrated by the CIA and MI6 which put the Shah in power. Blame the ones who created this situation – blame the UK and US.
Do you still believe the US administration is telling the whole truth about 9/11?
If any good is to come out of the orchestrated protests taking place across much of the Islamic world, it is surely to show the complete absence by the so-called faithful of any confidence in their god. The same goes for the crazy evangelicals and Roman Catholics railing against women’s empowerment and harmless gay people. If they had even the slightest belief that their deity was real they would leave these issues to be sorted out supernaturally and get on with their own lives. So we can be sure that the protests prove there is no god. The concept of the father God is dead – the future is female!
Next we can look and listen and see who is behind all this. On the one hand we have the men in the US who made the film “Innocence of Muslims”.
They may belong to a religion – Coptic Christianity and Zionist Judaism have been mentioned, although there is no proof of this – or it may be an intelligence agency project designed as part of a centuries-old divide and conquer strategy.
Britain and the US have played the religious fundamentalist card many times to destroy the legitimate aspirations of self-determination by many nations across the world.
Exactly the same way that they’ve used fake fears of “communism” to justify invasions, installing despots and unleashing death squads.
Both the US and UK have deliberately created the situations in Iraq and Egypt where theocratic regimes dominate rather than let the people find modern democratic solutions to their society’s problems. The UK has schemed with the Muslim Brotherhood for decades to counter nationalist movements in Egypt and paid Shia ayatollahs to wreak havoc in Iraq in order to keep cheap oil flowing under the rule of the evil Shah.
Similarly, the US traded with the ayatollahs in post-revolutionary Iraq in order to buy weapons and pay for their illegal war against the democratically elected Sandinista government in Nicaragua.
Oliver North wasn’t acting alone folks – it was a deliberate US policy.
And what about Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia has spent more money on promoting their monstrous Wahhabist version of Islam than any PR project, ever.
Think about that for a minute – more money than any other PR project…
Everybody I’ve asked to guess which is the biggest PR campaign, has come up with reasonable answers like ‘Coca-cola’, ‘Soap powder’ or ‘Volkswagen’ but it’s those lovable old sheiks – the House of Saud. Britain and more recently the US have created and buttressed this evil state with one reason in mind…
Successive US and UK governments have known full well, all along, what the Saudis were doing and they just let it happen.
Remember what nationality most of the 9/11 hijackers were? Which nationalities gave most money to Osama Bin Laden to fund al Qaeda? Yep – Saudis. Yet both US and UK bigwigs bend over backwards to congratulate the Saudis for being ‘moderate’ and a bulwark against ‘extremism’.
Next in line for funding and supporting extremism comes Pakistan, another state created and supported by the West. Pakistan’s ISI created and still supports the Taliban and Haqqani network yet our government hails it as a partner in the fight against terrorism.
Even a cursory reading of the histories of South America and the Middle East will confirm the above, but how many people actually investigate things for themselves?
While folk are caught in the maze of religion they have no time to learn their own history and how the elites have fooled them so many times and for so long. They debate endlessly about unanswerable questions while the men in control continue to build their empires.
The Greeks were already discussing mathematics, physics, astronomy, geometry, philosophy, drama, criticism and poetry, among other things, over 2,500 years ago and had invented the gymnasium, democracy and some brilliant architecture.
I don’t mean to argue they created all this from scratch as they obviously built on earlier work by the Babylonians, Egyptians and others. Also the Indus and Chinese cultures were also investigating these and other areas of knowledge.
But Islam – in its present Saudi-sponsored form, earlier versions were much more enlightened – and modern Christianity are taking us down an intellectual one way street, a cul-de-sac, a road to nowhere.
That is why both religions oppose the empowerment of women – they know that as women become more educated and powerful they will take our species towards enlightenment and away from warfare and domination.
So they try to stop women having control over their own bodies and thus control of reproduction, because they know that whoever controls reproduction, controls the future.
The religious and political leaders are only too aware they need new workers, congregations and soldiers, so attempt to keep women ignorant and powerless – but they’re fighting a losing battle.
That is why I wrote my satirical novel, DOG Sharon: The Future is Female (DOG is an acronym for Daughter Of God).
The book is an attack on male-defined religions and the use of violence as a political system.
Supporters of the present system claim there is no alternative but they know this isn’t true. Evidence for this can be seen in how they kill and imprison activists the world over. They know the general trend of history is toward self-expression and self-determination so they murder, repress and lie to hold back the tide.
But as the clever King Canute showed his ignorant followers hundreds of years ago, time and tides halt for no man…
THE FUTURE IS FEMALE
Animal rights campaigners and British animal lovers have vowed to block “by any means possible” the wholesale murder of the UK’s largest wild carnivore – the badger.
According to the UK Guardian, the government is poised to give the go-ahead to the first full-scale cull of badgers in England, under a policy that could soon mean as many as 100,000 of the animals – a third of the national population – will be hunted down and shot dead by farmers and hired marksmen in a futile attempt to protect cattle from bovine tuberculosis.
Remember it was the Thatcher Conservative government that caused BSE in the UK that led to the killing of four and a half million cattle and the deaths of 200 people worldwide.
Proof that the scientific advice doesn’t support the government’s murderous plans can be seen in the fact that the minister responsible won’t release papers applied for under Freedom of Information rules, claiming they were ‘internal documents’.
According to Whitehall sources, the first of two licences is expected to be issued as soon as Monday for a large pilot cull area in Gloucestershire, which is a hotspot for bovine TB.
The last Labour government said an oral badger vaccine would be ready by 2015. The coalition cancelled five of six trials of injectable vaccines, and said a viable oral vaccine was “years away”.
I ask folk to boycott all English beef and try not to eat meat at all – it’s bad for you in many ways and raises cholesterol levels and causes bowel cancer.
For further disgusting details see my recent post: http://dogsharon.com/2012/09/16/meat-is-murder-for-the-animals-the-environment-and-the-climate/
Is there anything more insidious than NATIONAL SECURITY?
Everybody knows governments do terrible things in our name and then claim they are protecting the nation.
But in reality they only protect the interests of a few as these agencies are working for a small elite and see their populations as part of the problem. They spy on us and feed us bullshit while claiming they are protecting us from the very violent groups they employ for their games of conquest and control.
Now they are attempting to add another level of legal secrecy to cover-up their evil practices. Torture is illegal under all circumstances – there are no exceptions whatsoever.
This vile government and the shitty New Labour administration before them are complicit in crimes against humanity – they acted as the US’s stooge and assisted in rendition and torture against suspects and haven’t got the courage to admit it. So they try and change the law to hide this from public scrutiny.
It is important to remember that in Britain the elite are drawn from a very small group of people. They went to the same few schools, the same two universities and come from a small number of trusted families. It’s been this way for centuries and our rulers don’t want it to change as they are totally corrupted by power.
So-called democracy hasn’t changed this power structure because the elites control the law, military, media and state.
Below is a report from the UK Guardian explaining the Justice and Security Bill is currently in the Lords (unelected elites) under scrutiny from senior former judges and lawyers (also part of establishment). If passed it will allow the government to apply to the courts in civil cases for evidence either to be struck out altogether through a public interest immunity certificate or heard in secret if disclosure in open court would prejudice national security.
In actuality this means either revealing torture or that the states was complicit in other illegal activities.
But remember, judges are from the small elite – they probably played at Eton or Harrow with members of the government – and you can read that in several ways!
At present the government can only apply for a public interest immunity certificate to protect sensitive intelligence material from being disclosed or even considered by the judge.
Ministers are trying to introduce an additional avenue for sensitive material in civil cases to be heard through a closed material procedure, where the evidence could be examined in private by the judge, prosecution lawyers and a special advocate acting on behalf of the claimant. Strict limits would be imposed on what the special advocate could disclose to the claimant.
Concern about the government’s plan – contained in the Justice and Security Bill – was expressed by Prof Juan Méndez, the UN’s special rapporteur on torture. “If a country is in possession of information about human right abuses, but isn’t in a position to mention them, it hampers the ability to deal effectively with torture,” he said. Méndez, himself a victim of torture in his native Argentina in the 1970s, was speaking at the thinktank Chatham House on Monday night.
After attacking the US for what he called the “extensive use of state secrets” to suppress evidence of torture and other abuses, Méndez referred to the so-called control principle, which allows governments to determine how its intelligence can be used once shared with another state.
UK Ministers claim the secrecy is needed to protect its intelligence-sharing relationship with the US and other governments, while critics argue it is to conceal crimes committed by the British government, including involvement in the rendition and torture of British citizens suspected of being terrorists.
Another 9/11 documentary on TOP DOCUMENTARY FILMS
What happened on the morning of September 11, 2001? Why were US defenses ineffective? Pilots For 9/11 Truth analyze NORAD response, Audio recordings as well as Radar data provided by government agencies.
War Games, Simulated radar tracks, aircraft exceeding their max operating limits by more than 130-150 knots, inaccurate aircraft position reports, false aircraft target reports, aircraft converging – flying virtually in formation with – and then diverging from reported 9/11 aircraft, fighters launched in the wrong direction, aircraft seemingly still airborne after the alleged attack, poor communications, phones not working…
Pilots for 9/11 Truth is an organization of aviation professionals and pilots throughout the globe who have gathered together for one purpose. They’re are committed to seeking the truth surrounding the events of the 11th of September 2001.
Their main focus concentrates on the four flights, maneuvers performed and the reported pilots. They do not offer theory or point blame at this point in time. However, they are focused on determining the truth of that fateful day based on solid data and facts – since 9/11/2001 is the catalyst for many of the events shaping our world today – and the United States Government doesn’t seem to be very forthcoming with answers or facts.
How long can these injustices continue?
A Palestinian child was seriously injured after being hit by a settlers’ vehicle as she was walking home from school in Tiqoua’ village, near the West Bank city of Bethlehem.
File – Settler’s Vehicles Hitting Children In Jerusalem – AFP Photo – ILIA YEFIMOVICH
Medical sources reported that the child was identified as Hayat Mohammad Suleiman, 8 years old. She was walking back home from school on the main road that is also used by Israeli settlers living in illegal Israeli settlements in the area.
The sources added that an Israeli ambulance arrived at the scene and moved the child to Hadassah Israeli Hospital in Jerusalem.
Last month, an Israeli settler driving in Jaber Neighborhood, in the southern West Bank of Hebron, hit a Palestinian child then drove off in what appears to be a ramming attack, medical…
View original post 119 more words
It’s always sad when folk die and an ambassador is no exception. But let’s get it in proportion, 30,000 poor kids die every day globally from preventable illnesses – that’s the real tragedy of our times.But the old journalist’s adage is true – one American death is more newsworthy than 100 poor folks’ demise…
Most people can remember what they were doing on the 11th of September 2001, yet most people do not know what really happened on that day.
Since then hundreds of thousands of innocent folk have died – men, women and children – and don’t forget the awful effects on the environment of all these bombs, missiles and other acts of war – yet most of the world does not believe the US government’s account.
So I suggest you think for yourself – examine the evidence – consider, critically evaluate and discuss this event with others. What is definite is that nation states do lie and run False Flag Operations – the UK has done it many times, the US has done it many times. Russia has done it, no doubt every miltary power does.
Think what being a ‘military power’ means…
There are several key questions to consider when thinking about the attack on the World Trade Center:
What was the historical relationship between US intelligence and Osama Bin Laden?
Why exactly did the Twin Towers collapse? There are many related issues here – the buildings were designed to withstand exactly this type of impact. No buildings of this type anywhere else in the world have suffered catastrophic collapse due to fire and this design is still being used for new buildings.
Why were no fighter jets scrambled to intercept the airliners? This is one of those unbelievable coincidences that strike you as crazy when studying 9/11 – there was supposedly a training exercise running at the very moment it happened with a scenario of jets crashing into the World Trade Centre.
It’s worth comparing this to the London 7/7 bombings – there were training scenarios running at the same time these explosions went off. Do you believe that? Also, why was no actual video footage of the four alleged7/7 bombers released or shown.
Why did Building 7 collapse? Building 7 was another huge construction on the site which wasn’t hit by anything but fell like a controlled demolition.
Why did President Bush keep reading to primary school kids for some time after he knew what was happening? There’s film of this – watch his face.
Why did Bush and his cronies keep saying Iraq was responsible?
What really hit the Pentagon? There’s film of this – check out the hole and wreckage – do you really believe a jet airliner caused that? Listen to professional pilots who say a commercial airliner couldn’t have flown that path and angle.
Why wasn’t there a proper investigation?
Why were members of the Bin Laden family secretly flown out of the USA without being questioned?
Why was the head of Pakistani intelligence in New York that day and why was money wired to him and leaders of the terrorists?
Why were wives of the dead vilified and had their calls for proper investigations blocked?
Why if most of the alleged hijackers Saudi Arabians did the US attack Iraq?
Why did so many of the survivors and first-responders report multiple explosions in the towers like a controlled demolition? Have you seen a controlled demolition? Watch some online then compare to the Twin Towers and Building 7 collapses.
Why did US Navy Seals supposedly kill Osama Bin Laden if the US authorities claim he was behind the 9/11 attacks? Why not put him on trial?
Why are so many experts and senior people all over the world calling for a proper investigation?
The best place to start this examination is at TOP DOCUMENTARY FILMS – they have 44 documentaries on 9/11 alone.
Here’s the link – check it out and let’s have an informed debate…
Also check out these other bloggers comments:
Brilliant article about the long-term effects of the 9/11 attacks
Looking back 11 years ago at the 9-11 Terror Attacks, its sad to see the assaults against innocent people in America didn’t stop with those planes crashing into the World Trade & the Pentagon…
I recall that fateful day, how our heart went out to first responders like those brave officers in NYPD who lost their lives.. We embraced them and held them up high and gave them all that they needed to protect the city. 11 years later we have come to see how NYPD took their newly granted powers and use in the most vicious ways against fellow New Yorkers..
We’ve seen NYPD under the guise of ‘fighting terror’ use tactics like Stop and Frisk resulting in them inconveniencing and often times absolutely humiliated close to 700k people last year alone.. Under Stop and Frisk we’ve seen over 85% of those stopped being young Black and Brown males…
View original post 1,221 more words
Google “Operation Gladio” and “P2 masonic conspiracy” for more mind-blowing stuff…
President of Italy’s Supreme Court to Refer 9/11 Crimes To International Criminal Court
Says that 9/11 was “False Flag” Terror, Just Like the Strategy of Tension in Italy
Ferdinando Imposimato is the honorary President of the Supreme Court of Italy, and former Senior Investigative Judge, Italy.
Imposimato presided over several terrorism-related cases, including the kidnapping and ultimate assassination of President Aldo Moro, the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II, other political assassinations and kidnapping cases and several cases against the Mafia. He is a former Senator who served on the Anti-Mafia Commission in three administrations.
Imposimato is also a former legal consultant to the United Nations regarding institution of laws to control drug trafficking.
This week, Judge Imposimato stated publicly in writing that 9/11 was just like the “strategy of tension” carried out in Italy.
Specifically, the former Italian Prime Minister, Italian judges…
View original post 391 more words
Few people are unaware of the situation with Julian Assange holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London due to him fighting and losing the legal battle against an extradition warrant from Sweden. Equally, most people know that the British authorities are well aware that it is the United States that really wants to get their hands on Julian Assange because of his involvement in the whistle-blowing site, Wikileaks.
What most people don’t know however is that Britain has a very chequered history when it comes to extraditing wanted suspects to foreign governments. Britain is very quick to accede to these demands for computer hackers, businessmen and children who have downloaded copyright material but when the suspect is a terrorist, very different outcomes have occurred. Below are details of three such terrorist suspects that Britain did not extradite when requested.
Anas al-Liby a computer expert based in Sudan travelled to Afghanistan to train al Qaeda operatives in surveillance. In 1993 he went to Nairobi, and staying in the flat of an al Qaeda supporter, began to develop surveillance pictures of the U.S. embassy. This was the beginning of a five year plot that culminated in the bombings of the embassy in Nairobi in August 1998.
Subsequently al-Liby was indicted and became one of America’s most wanted fugitives with a $25,000,000 reward on his head. In 1995 he came to Britain and applied for and was granted asylum. Not long after this, Egyptian authorities sent a file on his terrorist background to the British government which included details of his part in an assassination attempt on President Mubarak in 1995. Britain however refused to extradite him, claiming he might not get a fair trial and could face the death penalty. al-Liby lived in Manchester, UK for some years and disappeared before the U.S. pressured the British authorities into to trying to pick him up.
Another similar case is that of Abu Hamza who was born in Egypt and founded the organization, The Supporters of Shariah.
He was involved in the war in Bosnia as an adviser to Algerian fighters. Abu Hamza was also wanted by the Egyptian government who requested his extradition to face charges of terrorism. Again, the British authorities rejected this and another request made in 1990 from the Yemen. There is evidence to show that the Metropolitan Police’s intelligence agency, Special Branch, had many meetings with Abu Hamza and it is thought by many that he probably became their informer.
Abu Hamza preached at the infamous Finsbury Park mosque and was responsible for many Islamic radicals travelling to fight in various parts of the world. He organized terrorist training camps across England and Wales where recruits were taught how to manage guns and explosives by British ex-soldiers. He was arrested many times but mysteriously released. When the United States Department of Justice requested his extradition, the UK charged him with a minor offence and he was not questioned about his alleged connections to major terrorist groups.
Abu Qatada was known as al Qaeda’s spiritual leader in Europe and described by a judge in 2004 as a “truly dangerous individual at the centre of terrorist activities in the United Kingdom” and on top of this, the British government ignored warnings before 9/11 from half a dozen friendly governments about his links with terrorist groups and refused to arrest him. Abu Qatada arrived in London in 1993 with a forged United Arab Emirates passport and claimed asylum. The next year he was granted indefinite leave to remain in Britain until 1998. During this period he agitated for and recruited for Egyptian Islamic Jihad and Algerian terrorist organizations.
In 1995 he issued a religious order known as a Fatwa which justified the killing of wives and children of enemies of the Algerian terrorists. In 1998 he was sentenced in his absence in Jordan for inciting a series of bomb attacks and the authorities requested his extradition. Yet when his leave to remain in Britain came up for review that year he was allowed to stay in the country and not arrested. In 2001 he was arrested by anti terrorism police officers but then released due to insufficient evidence. After the 9/11 bombings he was identified by the United States as a ‘global terrorist’. Amazingly he was still not arrested by the British authorities because they claim there was not enough hard evidence to bring charges against him, and they would not deport him to Jordan in case he faced the death penalty. Eventually in December 2001 the British parliament was about to pass new anti terror legislation and Abu Qatada was tipped off, fled the country and disappeared.
LAtest news on Julian Assange – According to a joint news release issued today by the Indigenous Social Justice Association, the WikiLeaks Coalition, and the Australia-based Support Assange group, the whistle-blower’s father, John Shipton, will accept an “Aboriginal Land Passport” at a ceremony on Saturday (September 15).
Two interesting, but separate issues here – Criticism of Racist Israel and the sense or nonsense of postmodern writings around gender – a very good article
From Kenan Maliks blog Pandaemonium
Judith Butler is a queen, perhaps the queen, of poststructuralist philosophy. A pioneer of queer theory and one of the world’s leading feminist philosophers, she made her name with her 1990 book, Gender Trouble, which dismisses the idea of sex and gender as fixed categories, viewing them instead as forms of social artifice. Butler introduced in the book the concept of gender as ‘performativity’: by behaving as if there were male and female ‘natures’ we create the social fiction that these natures exist.
Next week Butler is due to receive the prestigious Adorno Prize. Awarded by the city of Frankfurt to honour its most celebrated philosophical son, Theodor Adorno, the triennial award is given for ‘outstanding work in the fields of philosophy, music, theatre and film’. Previous winners have included such luminaries as Jurgen Habermas, Zygmunt Bauman, Norbert Elias, Pierre Boulez, Jean-Luc Goddard and György…
View original post 1,431 more words
Today the Democrats in convention claimed that so-called Jerusalem (Al-Quds) was the capital of Israel, but it isn’t. There are so many reports here and so many are heartbreaking – how long will the world let this abuse of the Palestinian people continue?
آخر الأخبار والتحديثات
Sept 6, 2012 | 23928 Days Since Al-Nakba & Gaza has been under siege for 1912 days
For news of previous news days | Daily News Overviews
Follow on Twitterfor more live updates
Published by Adalah, Physicians for Human Rights-Israel and Al Mezan Centre for Human Rights | June 26, 2012
“On Torture” is an edited volume of essays by Palestinian, Israeli and international legal and medical experts and practitioners based on presentations that they gave during a workshop held in Jerusalem in April 2011 entitled, “Securing Accountability for Torture and Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment (CIDT) in Israel: New Trends and Comparative Lessons”.
Ismael Haniyeh’s Letter To the Bradley Manning Peace Camp at the Democratic Party Convention in North Carolina |Read more…
How to deal with Zionism: Oppose – Expose – Dispose ~ by @docjazzmusic
View original post 1,567 more words
Impressive and important Swedish documentary on
TOP DOCUMENTARY FILMS
about the growth, people and philosophy of Wikileaks
Britain has a bad record with regard to Egypt – we’ve used and abused their people for decades. MI6 organised coup attempts, we invaded over the Suez canal and planned many attempts on Nasser’s life rather than accept the will of the Egyptian people.
What many people don’t know is that we also conspired with the Muslim Brotherhood many times – even though the Foreign Office knew the Brotherhood were no friends of the English, but because they calculated the Muslims were the lesser of two evils.
Now the Guardian has revealed much of the money stolen by Mubarak and his family and cronies was laundered through the City of London. And to add insult to injury, we’ve let them move it around with impunity – enabling the criminals to hide vast amounts from Egyptian investigators.
Also read Secret Affairs by Mark Curtis. Curtis’s book shows how the UK conspired with some of the most unsavoury regimes such as the Saudi Arabians and most feared terrorist groups in the world.
It’s almost funny the way the British state talks about law and order when they’ve had absolutely no respect for anything but power and riches for the past few centuries.
They have no shame…
This is why I’ve always hated circuses…
This is big news…
Court decides confessed killer was not psychotic when he went on rampage in Oslo that left 77 people dead. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/24/breivik-verdict-sane-21-years
How can this behaviour be sane? What would constitute insane behaviour then?
Obviously Norway is not in danger of losing its culture to Islam and Intellectual Marxism so in what way is the bloke sane?
If he’s sane, then was the Sikh murderer sane? Was Adolf Hitler sane? Of course not.
This is a worrying trend.
White Christian murderers are never labelled as “Terrorist” yet if it was a dark-skinned person they would be.
If Breivik is sane the rest of us must be mad.