We’ve just watched a really mind-blowing documentary film about 9/11 – in particular the supposed attack on the Pentagon.
BTW Does anybody know why this building has five sides?
The movie is entitled
If you only watch one 9/11 film in your life, then I suggest you spend one hour twenty minutes on this movie.
This is what the makers say about the documentary:
In 2006 Citizen Investigation Team launched an independent investigation into the act of terrorism which took place at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.
This exhaustive three-year inquest involved multiple trips to the scene of the crime in Arlington, Virginia, close scrutiny of all official and unofficial data related to the event, and, most importantly, first-person interviews with dozens of eyewitnesses, many of which were conducted and filmed in the exact locations from which they witnessed the plane that allegedly struck the building that day.
Be forewarned: Our findings are extraordinarily shocking and frightening. They are also deadly serious, and deserving of your immediate attention. This is not about a conspiracy theory or any theory at all.
This is about independent, verifiable evidence which unfortunately happens to conclusively establish as a historical fact that the violence which took place in Arlington that day was not the result of a surprise attack by suicide hijackers, but rather a false flag “black operation” involving a carefully planned and skillfully executed deception.
(More at citizeninvestigationteam.com)
Do you still believe the US administration is telling the whole truth about 9/11?
Another 9/11 documentary on TOP DOCUMENTARY FILMS
What happened on the morning of September 11, 2001? Why were US defenses ineffective? Pilots For 9/11 Truth analyze NORAD response, Audio recordings as well as Radar data provided by government agencies.
War Games, Simulated radar tracks, aircraft exceeding their max operating limits by more than 130-150 knots, inaccurate aircraft position reports, false aircraft target reports, aircraft converging – flying virtually in formation with – and then diverging from reported 9/11 aircraft, fighters launched in the wrong direction, aircraft seemingly still airborne after the alleged attack, poor communications, phones not working…
Pilots for 9/11 Truth is an organization of aviation professionals and pilots throughout the globe who have gathered together for one purpose. They’re are committed to seeking the truth surrounding the events of the 11th of September 2001.
Their main focus concentrates on the four flights, maneuvers performed and the reported pilots. They do not offer theory or point blame at this point in time. However, they are focused on determining the truth of that fateful day based on solid data and facts – since 9/11/2001 is the catalyst for many of the events shaping our world today – and the United States Government doesn’t seem to be very forthcoming with answers or facts.
Most people can remember what they were doing on the 11th of September 2001, yet most people do not know what really happened on that day.
Since then hundreds of thousands of innocent folk have died – men, women and children – and don’t forget the awful effects on the environment of all these bombs, missiles and other acts of war – yet most of the world does not believe the US government’s account.
So I suggest you think for yourself – examine the evidence – consider, critically evaluate and discuss this event with others. What is definite is that nation states do lie and run False Flag Operations – the UK has done it many times, the US has done it many times. Russia has done it, no doubt every miltary power does.
Think what being a ‘military power’ means…
There are several key questions to consider when thinking about the attack on the World Trade Center:
What was the historical relationship between US intelligence and Osama Bin Laden?
Why exactly did the Twin Towers collapse? There are many related issues here – the buildings were designed to withstand exactly this type of impact. No buildings of this type anywhere else in the world have suffered catastrophic collapse due to fire and this design is still being used for new buildings.
Why were no fighter jets scrambled to intercept the airliners? This is one of those unbelievable coincidences that strike you as crazy when studying 9/11 – there was supposedly a training exercise running at the very moment it happened with a scenario of jets crashing into the World Trade Centre.
It’s worth comparing this to the London 7/7 bombings – there were training scenarios running at the same time these explosions went off. Do you believe that? Also, why was no actual video footage of the four alleged7/7 bombers released or shown.
Why did Building 7 collapse? Building 7 was another huge construction on the site which wasn’t hit by anything but fell like a controlled demolition.
Why did President Bush keep reading to primary school kids for some time after he knew what was happening? There’s film of this – watch his face.
Why did Bush and his cronies keep saying Iraq was responsible?
What really hit the Pentagon? There’s film of this – check out the hole and wreckage – do you really believe a jet airliner caused that? Listen to professional pilots who say a commercial airliner couldn’t have flown that path and angle.
Why wasn’t there a proper investigation?
Why were members of the Bin Laden family secretly flown out of the USA without being questioned?
Why was the head of Pakistani intelligence in New York that day and why was money wired to him and leaders of the terrorists?
Why were wives of the dead vilified and had their calls for proper investigations blocked?
Why if most of the alleged hijackers Saudi Arabians did the US attack Iraq?
Why did so many of the survivors and first-responders report multiple explosions in the towers like a controlled demolition? Have you seen a controlled demolition? Watch some online then compare to the Twin Towers and Building 7 collapses.
Why did US Navy Seals supposedly kill Osama Bin Laden if the US authorities claim he was behind the 9/11 attacks? Why not put him on trial?
Why are so many experts and senior people all over the world calling for a proper investigation?
The best place to start this examination is at TOP DOCUMENTARY FILMS – they have 44 documentaries on 9/11 alone.
Here’s the link – check it out and let’s have an informed debate…
Also check out these other bloggers comments:
This is the place to while away the hours and get educated into the bargain. It’s the equivalent of going to university, but you can stay at home and there’s no fees. Remember to say thanks to Vlatko if you visit ’cause it’s his place.
We saw a short film earlier and it’s well worth watching – it’s entitled “9/11 The Sensible Doubt” and below is the blurb:
What happened on September 11, 2001? All over the world, people question the official story and explanation about the events that took place in USA more than 10 years ago.
In this Danish documentary you will meet architect Jan Utzon, MP Benny Engelbrecht, professor Niels Harrit, airline captain Niels Studstrup, journalist Tommy Hansen and artist Jacob Fuglsang.
They will talk about their doubt and skepticism and explain why they have come to feel and think this way. The film is in Danish with English subtitles.
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Walid bin Attash, Ramzi bin al-Shibh, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali and Mustafa al-Hawsawi were held for years in CIA in black sites and subject to what the US government euphemistically terms “enhanced interrogation methods” before being transferred to military custody at Guantanamo in September 2006.
With another choice euphemism, the government describes them as “participants in the CIA programme”. That participation exposed them to “classified sources, methods and activities”.
The challenge the government faces is how to prosecute people who have been tortured without putting the torturers and those who authorised them on trial, too. Of course, no one responsible for CIA torture has actually been put on trial, but these 9/11 defendants are a weak link in the wall of unaccountability.
If they testify or speechify about their “participation” in the CIA’s interrogation programme, then journalists and others observing the military commission might hear things that the government claims would cause “exceptionally grave damage to national security”. To avert that possibility, the government has produced a protective order to make everything the defendants say presumptively classified, pending completion of a classification review.
If the government’s order is accepted by Judge James Pohl, then every time one of the defendants speaks, the sound will be cut off to the observation booth at the back of the courtroom where journalists and observers sit and to other remote sites where the proceedings are being projected. The sound system in that courtroom is set up for a 40-second audio delay, a feature utilised at other hearings that have taken place in it, including the 2008 arraignment of these five defendants.
In this case, however, the protective order would impose not a brief delay or selective blockage, but full-scale censorship. Only those words cleared by censors would ever be heard, later. Actually, they would never be “heard”, but rather would be made available in the form of redacted transcripts. If the government prevails, observers at any of the 9/11 hearings would see, but not hear those on trial.
Lisa Hajjar – professor of sociology at the University of California
Now for a laugh – The Kid’s page on the CIA website
(I’m not spoofing)